Review of Pitchfork’s Review of The Sophtware Slump

Here are a few points that I feel I need to declare before I start.

1. I love Grandaddy, and The Soft­ware Slump in particular.

2. I gen­er­ally hate Pitchfork.

I was look­ing up this album on Wikipedia, hop­ing that there was some­thing new and inter­est­ing about this album that I could learn. There wasn’t. But I did click on the link to the Pitch­fork review. What a mis­take that was.

It’s been almost 10 years since this album was released. When eval­u­at­ing a work of art, know­ing when it was made helps you deter­mine the con­text. But, and this is appar­ently very impor­tant, the album was released some­time in early 1999. So much of the review is spent talk­ing about how this might be an early con­tender for “album of the year.”

I don’t under­stand why crit­ics fix­ate on these arbi­trary year-​​to-​​year dis­tinc­tions. Espe­cially in a review. And espe­cially in a review that is avail­able on the inter­net 10 years after it was first written.

Peo­ple talk an awful lot lately about how online jour­nal­ism (blog­ging) is killing print jour­nal­ism. Every time I read some­thing on Pitch­fork, it makes me sad because even smelly old Rolling Stone is bet­ter than this garbage. And it’s never the albums they choose to review or their rat­ings or any­thing like that — it’s entirely their tone that both­ers me. See this old post.

Still, I guess 8.5/10 ain’t half bad. I give this review, how­ever, a 1.475 out of 10.

Leave a Reply

«

»